A most beautiful baby
Made the old fashioned way
As we witty
little smart-alecks used to say back in junior high school, a big, soft wad of
it is about to hit the fan!
Designer
babies! The very thought frightens most
of us, and puzzles the rest. You all are
aware of the potential for using “edited” genes to combat disease, especially
cancer. These alterations are applied to
“somatic” cells, often using the CRISPR cas9 technology, about which I have
written many times. This use of
DNA-modification raises no ethical problems; no potential human life is
sacrificed by editing somatic cells, and any such changes cannot be passed on
to the next generation.
You also are
aware of the ethical battles surrounding the use of embryonic stem cells for
any purpose other than to produce babies.
Such “pluripotent” cells have the capacity to turn into anything the
body requires. However, their main
biological “purpose” is to turn into a human being. Thus, some say, sacrificing a stem cell for
anything else is tantamount to murder.
Many conferences have been devoted to the ethics of this sort of thing,
and emotions run high. Fortunately it now
is possible to chemically coax a mature cell back to its pluripotent state, so
with luck it may be possible to leave the embryonic type alone.
It is
possible, however, to “edit” the DNA of an embryonic cell – and such an editing
job can be inherited. Therein rests big ethical questions, because editing heritable DNA is the road to designer babies.
In the
United States experimenting on this subject is almost universally condemned –
and moreover, illegal. Not so, it
appears, in China.
In a
southern Chinese technical center, a researcher (they call him He) claims to
have successfully added a gene to embryonic DNA that will protect against HIV. He has yet to publish his results properly,
so some skepticism exists. His method
involves processes done in vitro and
thus is neither simple nor swift.
However, He says, healthy twin girls have been born with their modified
DNA safely aboard. They, and their
descendants, will be resistant to HIV.
By the way,
Dr. He was educated at Rice and Stanford.
He is no Chinese witch doctor prescribing ground rhino horn for erectile
dysfunction. Still, great doubt abounds,
and all await the definitive publication.
Then, assuming He really did it, an ethical shit-storm inevitably will
arise. I will wait until then to wade into that particular fetid swamp.
The august and magisterial NTTimes weighs in on the subject: an ill-concealed thumbs down.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/26/health/gene-editing-babies-china.html?em_pos=large&emc=edit_sc_20181127&nl=science-times&nlid=69247603edit_sc_20181127&ref=img&te=1
Okay, maybe I will get this right someday. He didn’t add a gene, he disabled one that somehow permits HIV to do its dirty work. This is just as dangerous, though; who knows what else that gene was designed to do?
ReplyDeleteThis story is exploding internationally. Here is another treatment:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-46382662