The NY Times
has provided us with a brief discussion of the discovery, usage, and functionality
of the almost-famous biological tool, CRISPR.
If you have been diligent in following this blog, nothing here will
surprise you. Read it anyway; it will
refresh your memory.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#search/crispr/FMfcgzGpGdmqLbBnhzvwNwvNDxCFWxGc
As you know,
CRISPR is a powerful “gene editing” devise, discovered and made available to
medical science by Drs Jennifer Doudna and Emanuel Charpentier about ten years
ago. The discovery was so important that
the pair won the Nobel Prize almost immediately – rather than having to wait 20
or so years, as is commonly the case.
CRISPR
stands for CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALENDROMIC REPEATS, in case
you had forgotten. We (humankind)
learned of it through studies of bacteria, which ubiquitous tribe had evolved
it as a protection against viruses.
CRISPR allows one to fabricate a molecule that can search out an
undesirable stretch of DNA, and cut it out – and maybe even replace it with
something better. This sounds like an
immeasurably potent weapon against disease – even OVCA. However, I am a little disappointed at
progress to date – but, heck, these things take time, I guess.
As you
surely can imagine, CRISPR has spawned a bunch of corporate activity. One such company, Intellia Theraputics has been cleaning up big-time. Alas, another, with Dr. Doudna in personal
attention, has so far been a dog.
Finally,
CRISPR is such a big deal that it elicited a full scale biography of Doudna by
a prominent biographer, Walter Issacson.
Unfortunately, it isn’t very good.
Dr. Doudna herself wrote a book about the discovery of CRISPR. It isn’t very good, either.
Well, nuts! It may be that you need a (free) subscription to the Times before ycan read the link. It may be worth the effort.
ReplyDeleteMaybe this will work:
ReplyDeletehttps://static.nytimes.com/email-content/SC_sample.html