Linda at the Seashore
Apparently there is, or has been, a serious problem
determining if an anomalous pelvic mass in a woman is or is not dangerous. I seem to understand that the evidence currently
used in diagnosis is concentration of the protein CA125; if it is high enough,
the surgeon goes to work. All too often,
though, the post-operation report goes something like “Woops! Just a benign growth, after all. Could have been ignored. That will be $30,000, please.” In other words, the statistical “specificity”
is poor.
Well, a Brit outfit called Angle has developed a “liquid
biopsy” (more commonly referred to as a blood test) that has double the
previous specificity. The test is called
the Parsortix test, and how it works is not explained, other than it involves
RNA somehow.
Not a cure, not prevention – but useful just the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment