Normally I introduce a blog entry with a picture of Linda but, in view of our recent election, I will use this shot to illustrate that there places on earth where no one gives a fig about
Donald Trump
Medieval armies relied on the horse. During the Napoleonic Wars, navies relied on
oak trees. Today in the war against cancer the one indispensable creature is, of course, the mouse. I have mentioned mice 27 times in the course
of this blog. For instance, early on I
introduced you to the “transgenic glowing reporter mouse”, and later to the “sublethally
irradiated nonobese diabetic severe combined immunodeficient mouse” (poor
little devil!). I also have heard of
“nude mice”, although what they are good for is a mystery to me. There must exist huge mouse farms, devoted to
breeding and genetically screwing up these miserable rodents. I would guess that the proprietors of these
diabolic (but essential) establishments have dreams wherein, having died, they
report to the Pearly Gates, only to discover that St. Peter is a huge white rat
with angry pink eyes and a swishing tail.
Well, in Holland right now they are
killing vast quantities of “immune-deficient mice”, for the good of
humanity. Dutch investigators have
determined that existing ovarian cancer (OVCA) cell lines do not do an adequate
job of mimicking the effect of their drug of the moment, on high grade serous
ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Thus, they have
taken to transferring OVCA cells to their mice from actual OVCA patients. Results from this seemingly cruel but
necessary operation they term “Patient-derived tumor xenografts” (PDXs; these
guys seem uncommonly fond of acronyms).
Results so far are encouraging, both for OVCA therapy and for
prediction.
This article (which is tough going) is
of particular interest to me because it deals with epigenetics (which I have
written about even more than about mice.)
One form of epigenetic control is to paste a methyl group (CH3)
on a segment of DNA, thereby somehow preventing the expression of a gene. It appears that HGSOC is accompanied by a distinctive
pattern of methylation, and thus can be used as a predictor. It seems to me that this knowledge also could
be used to derive a drug to reverse the effects of methylation – to scrub the
DNA double helix free of the little methyl devils, so to speak.
So let’s hope that global warming and sea-level
rise don’t first scrub the earth clean of these valuable Dutch labs!
http://www.science20.com/tushar_tomar/epigenetic_predictors_of_ovarian_cancer-180648
ReplyDeleteThe Economist – surely the world’s best newsmagazine (in a language I can read) – has published an in-depth expose of the traffic in lab mice. Turns out the vital little buggers are reasonably well treated, considering. All sorts of good details.
http://www.economist.com/news/christmas-specials/21712058-evolution-scientific-mainstay-worlds-favourite-lab-animal-has-been-found