Have I used this before?
Well, I don't care - it's a nice picture
Back in the 1970s, bubbling over with confidence after our
successes in space, America declared war on cancer. Forty year and many billions later, 15,000
American women will die of ovarian cancer this year. Yes, there have been some wonderful
successes, but we are still a long way from a biochemical moon landing. In fact, for some cancers, at least, we have
yet to reach a stable orbit. Anywhere.
In the 1990s a gene named TP53 was all the rage. TP53 codes for the protein p53, known in some
circles as the Angel on Death. P53
patrols the body, searching for defective cells. When it finds one it may order the cell to
die (apoptosis). As such it is a vital
tool against cancer. If p53 is disabled,
cancer may run wild.
Science writer Matt Ridley, in his book Genome: an autobiography of a species in 23 chapters was so
enthusiastic that he predicted imminent victory in the cancer war. About that same time p53 was declared
“Molecule of the Year”, presumably because of its promise as a weapon against
cancer. So, what are we doing, a
quarter-century later, still talking about p53’s potential? I think most of you know what I think.
Here are two blogs on p53:
So why is this important?* Well, a bunch of folks at UCLA have found
that one way ovarian cancer fights off the Angel of Death is to induce the p53
proteins to get all balled up in little knots.
They have adapted a molecule used to combat Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s
to unravel these ineffective little balls of p53. When this molecule is introduced into a
solution containing tiny ovarian cancers (in a culture dish, naturally), the
tumors are attacked with great vigor.
So, hurray, I guess. I’m not
holding my breath.
I am feeling uncommonly cynical this
afternoon, so I will comment on one thing further. UCLA has given the patents on this discovery
and its attendant technology to a bio-pharma concern recently started – by the
head of the lab that did this work.
One more Ferrari on the streets of
Los Angeles.
Read it and weep. http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/ucla-scientists-test-new-strategy-that-could-help-fight-ovarian-cancer
*So why is all this underlined? Ask the computer, not me.
I thought maybe you'd like to see Siddhartha Mukherjee talk in Seattle: https://www.lectures.org/season/special_events.php?id=437. (The Emperor of All Maladies).
ReplyDelete