By the sea, somewhere
Note the antique Geology T-shirt
Also, again, the presence of hair
I have written several times about the correlation of talc use and
the probability of contracting ovarian cancer, most recently on 9/13/13. The cause-and-effect doesn’t seem to have
been mapped out with much certainty; maybe the ultra-small particles of talc manage
to infiltrate a woman’s reproductive apparatus and, somehow, promote deleterious
mutations. Asbestos does the same thing,
more or less, to lung tissue. Anyway,
how it works doesn’t really matter; don’t use the stuff. And don’t smother your babies in it, either.
I was led to this topic by an article on a lawsuit being
prosecuted by a woman who had contracted ovarian cancer, after a lifetime of
using talcum powder (Johnson & Johnson)
in great profusion. She is suing for a
sum that dwarfs the GDP of most African countries. Her claim is that J & J knew all along that the powder
was dangerous, but didn’t stop marketing it.
If this is true, she deserves to win.
But there are several shades of gray here.
Living alone and being bored much of the time, I watch too
much TV. Nearly all of my favorite shows
will be interrupted periodically by advertisements for some new drug or
other. You have seen them; 30 seconds of
“what this wonderful stuff will do” followed by 2.5 minutes of warnings of
possible ill side-effects. (At the end
the couple - and there always is a couple – ends up in some preposterous but
suggestive arrangement, as for instance side by side in separate bathtubs!) What is going on here is obviously a ”cover-your-ass” maneuver; if you use the stuff and subsequently
grow a horn in the middle of your forehead – tough luck, you were warned.
So, let’s suppose that J & J discovered long ago that
talcum powder was dangerous, but kept it a secret. Then, sock it to’em and have no mercy.
But what if they never realized that their product was
dangerous and marketed it in good faith?
Then they should get off scot free – but they must immediately festoon
their talc-shakers with warnings. Indeed, maybe, they should take it off the
market entirely.
What seems to be happening here is that J & J has been
aware of suspicions amongst researchers that talc contributes to OVCA, but
maintains that this is not proved and gone on, business as usual. This may be legal, but it is unarguably
immoral. They should get soundly whacked.
Astonishingly, an earlier such lawsuit against J & J was
decided in the plaintiff’s favor – but no
damages were awarded! I’d like to have
listened to the jury’s deliberations.
More on talc, cancer, and lawsuits:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.pri.org/stories/2015-05-24/women-are-suing-johnson-johnson-over-talcum-powder
Yes, the several studies has been already proved that there is a correlation between talcum powder and ovarian cancer. Thanks for sharing the information related to the talcum powder lawsuit.
ReplyDelete